| National
Geographic's Strange Days
on Planet Earth
A candid
conversation with host Edward Norton
Q:
What about the subject matter of National Geographic's Strange
Days on Planet Earth really drew you to this project?
Edward
Norton: I've always had a broad interest in environmental
issues and increasing our collective knowledge about the interconnectedness
of life. This show explores the actual scientific basis behind
the old adage that when a butterfly flaps its wings in China,
it creates a hurricane in Africa.
Q:
What about the state of the environment, in particular, discourages
you today as you see it?
EN:
I think that we're behind where we ought to be in
terms of the sustainability of the way we're living. There are
certain thresholds, or tipping points, that I think this series
addresses in a really interesting way. We may be rapidly approaching
crashes in our ecosystems from which we will not recover, not
only in our lifetime but that of our children or grandchildren.
It's quite terrifying.
Q:
What signs are there that there is actually hope out there?
EN:
I think that the series on some levels addresses that
question. The more that science reveals the integrated nature
of the earth's biosphere and ecosystems, the more effectively
we can address some of the underlying causes. Also, I see great
work being done all over. I come from a family of activists.
My father is a career environmental activist. He is the director
of the Nature Conservancy's China program. On a per capita basis,
the United States is the worst environmental polluter in the
world, but China is also way up there. [China] has been characterized
traditionally as a place with very little environmental consciousness.
My father went into China very skeptical about what the real
level of support for conservation management would be. But he
has been astonished at the level of scientific sophistication
and real government support for building conservation management
models. That's exciting, and it makes you think that a lot of
positive change is really possible.
Q:
I read that Larry King declared that he would follow your lead
and install solar panels on his house.
EN:
I started a program through which the company BP Solar
agreed that any time a celebrity or public leader in any field
buys a solar system for their home through this program, BP
donates a matching system to a low-income family through a housing
foundation I work with. We're in the first year of the program,
and I talked about it on Larry King. Larry did agree to join,
and he's getting a solar system on his house.
Q:
So is he following through?
EN:
He is following through. Yeah he's actually doing it.
Q:
Given that you can pretty much drive any car out there right
now, can you talk about the advantages of driving a hybrid?
EN:
I live in New York, so I don't actually own a car,
but, I also have a home in Los Angeles, and when I'm working
on films or in LA for brief periods, I found a place that rents
hybrids. I think that on an environmental impact level, hybrids
are obviously more positive. They drive as well as anything,
other than a Porsche. If you think about it, with gas prices
going where they're going, nobody ultimately is going to buy
that car because it pollutes a little less, they're going to
buy it because, at $2.50 a gallon that car is going to save
them between three and four thousand dollars a year, for your
average commuter, on gas. And it's really interesting to see
the technology reach the point where the car companies and the
oil companies have no choice.
|